The 1987 Constitution devotes two important
provisions to emphasize the principle of the separation of church and state.
First, it categorically declares that the separation of church and state shall
be violable. And secondly, it recognizes religious freedom by enunciating the
principles that there shall be no law respecting an establishment of religion
or the free exercise thereof and that the free exercise and enjoyment of
religious profession and worship shall forever be allowed without
discrimination or preference.
This principle of the separation of church and state
does not prohibits the active participation of religious sects in secular
matters which have political complexion. What the Constitution prohibits is the
interference of the state to any religion or the active participation of the
government to matters involving the exercise of religious freedom. As Filipino
citizens, members of religious groups have rights and duties to participate in
the governance and take active role in politics as may be consistent to the
teaching of their faiths. Their citizenship gives them as much interest in the
fate of their country.
In fact the principles of the separation of the
Church and the State is becoming blurred when each consider the grave moral
crises confronting the society. In the face of the need to articulate the
concerns of their members, religious groups have begun acting outside the box
by breaking the stereotype that theirs are only concerns pertaining to the
private spheres of a believer’s life. The participation of religious groups in
public matters dominates the headlines of national and local dailies today.
The advocacies of Archbishop Ramon C. Arguelles
highlighted the duty of religious to participate in public matters within the
context of the separation of the Church and the State. Others may say that by
participating in the protests against mining activities in Lobo, Batangas and
the putting up of coal-fired power plant in Batangas City, he is violating the
principle of separation of church and state. This notion is misplaced to say
the least. This principle is far from proscribing the participation of the
church in politics. No constitutional principle may be claimed to be violated
unless, of course, the good Archbishop took over the management of a government
institution.
On the contrary, the Constitution will be
well-served by his insistence on the protection of the environment, the
cleansing of the electoral process, the promotion of the right to life, and the
dismantling of a corrupt political regime. Every Filipino citizen has the duty to protect
the values underlying the Constitution by advancing all the causes that he is
advancing. His motivations in doing so may not be different at all from that of
any public official regardless of his or her religious or political conviction.
The Constitution
promotes all religions. It protects them all. It cherishes them as it cherishes
the political rights of the people. In turn, the different religions must be
true to their teachings by actively rebuilding the society according to the
tenets of the fundamental law of the land.
No comments:
Post a Comment